"4326 is just the EPSG identifier of WGS84" [3]
Indeed http://spatialreference.org/ref/epsg/4326/html/ says it is a GEOGraphic Coordinate System:
GEOGCS["WGS 84",
DATUM["WGS_1984",
SPHEROID["WGS 84",6378137,298.257223563,AUTHORITY["EPSG","7030"]],
AUTHORITY["EPSG","6326"]],
PRIMEM["Greenwich",0,AUTHORITY["EPSG","8901"]],
UNIT["degree",0.01745329251994328,AUTHORITY["EPSG","9122"]],
AUTHORITY["EPSG","4326"]]
Citing [1], [...]
one of the most common ways the round world is displayed on a map is using the simplest projection we have:
x = longitude
y = latitudeThe name of this projection is “Plate Carrée”, and is widely used because it is so simple. However we often seem to forget that we are talking about a projection. Therefore the spatial reference for this projection is very often (mis)referenced as a spherical coordinate system like for EPSG:4326.
In [1] then a correct WKT for the Plate Carée projection is reported (a projection is overlaid over WGS84/EPSG:4326):
PROJCS["World_Plate_Carree_Degrees",
GEOGCS["GCS_WGS_1984",
DATUM["D_WGS_1984",SPHEROID["WGS_1984",6378137,298.257223563]],
PRIMEM["Greenwich",0],UNIT["Degree",0.017453292519943295]],
PROJECTION["Plate_Carree"],PARAMETER["False_Easting",0],
PARAMETER["False_Northing",0],PARAMETER["Central_Meridian",0],
UNIT["Degree",111319.49079327357264771338267056]]
which is ~EPSG:54001, except that units are not meters but degrees.
I am quite a bit confused for example if, at least in practice, EPSG:4326 is equivalent to Plate Carrée equirectangular projection.
E.g. in a computing environment, projected data is much more convenient since distances are Euclidean and not great-circles: would the distance between two points in EPSG:4326 be different then with respect to the same points in a Plate Carrée?
This is maybe specific to the single application, e.g. [2] Open Layers uses the term 'EPSG:4326' to mean the Plate Carrée projection. R
seems to assume a spherical WGS84 instead (-> r-sig-geo).
References:
No comments:
Post a Comment