Using QGIS, I am trying to digitize an old raster map, and because I ultimately want to load these 2d layers into sketch-up to turn into 3D models, I need everything to be square.
Here's a sample of the map I'm working with:
The green lines you can see are a vector layer of railway tracks I've already digitized using line geometries, the rest is a raster based layer that I've geo-referenced correctly and is the background behind every layer.
What I'm aiming to do is to capture the building footprints, taking my example, and using the normal capture polygon tool, something like this:
While this works sufficiently for producing a 2D vector map (EG: to display as web-map tiles or use in QGis) it's no good for exporting as KML, then importing into Sketch-up, as everything is not 100% square, and what's more it's extremely difficult to get things 100% square.
As you can see from my tools in QGis, I have the digitize rectangles, and cad-tools plug-ins installed, but these are no good for what I need to do, for example if we take the orthogonal polygon capture tool:
I can start off drawing my first line at the angle I need, but then as soon as I press CTRL to get things at a right angle and/or square to the first line, it all goes wrong because the plug-in doesn't take the rotational angle of the building into account, meaning that any additional points are true by dedicated north/east horiz/vertical, and 90 degrees to those axis.
If the building I'm trying to trace out is on those axis, then no problem, everything's perfect, but a lot of them are not, there at various angles around the complex (It's a large factory site I'm digitizing)
The perfect tool, would be similar to the origin tool in sketch up, what you do with that is place the origin start on one corner, then stretch out an X and a Y which are at 90 deg to each other, one across the front face, one down the left face, anything you then snap to those origins, or any guides derived from it are automatically at 90 deg to the other lines, but with the rotation factored in as needed as you can see in the next image:
Capturing and digitizing the polygons in sketch-up is certainly possible without using QGis first, but if I do them that way, I can't georef them, they just come out with standard world co-ordinates centered around 0,0
Digitizing them in QGis, is done so that the location in space, is correct and conforms to the OSGB36 projection.
Sketch-up also will not obey the geo referencing in the background map, when I try to import that, it anchors the bottom left at 0,0 then asks me to scale it appropriately.
The only way I've found of getting a geo-referenced map into sketch-up is if I use the capture area from Google earth tool. However, as of SK version 8 or higher, when doing this it only imports the base Google earth Ariel photography, and not any custom overlays you might have displayed, meaning if I load my georef in, it gets ignored when I try to capture the geo-referenced location.
Sketch-up V7 and lower did not ignore custom imagery, but V7 is no longer available for download, and even if you find a copy it wont run because the auth server won't authenticate keys for it anymore... :-(
The Ultimate Question
So essentially what I'm asking is does anyone know of a plug-in for QGis that gives me similar functionality to that in sketch-up, and if not can anyone suggest a way (or workflow) that would allow me to capture the building footprints while keeping the edges orthogonal to each other, but without being locked to the horizontal and vertical as the current tools are.
Even someway of providing a snappable grid where I could at least align the points to building corners would be an improvement.
If not, then it looks like I'm going to have to learn the QGis plug-in api and write my own plugin.
Answer
I was still using version 2.2.0 when I posted this question, I've since upgraded to 2.8.1.
What follows is a little bit of a tutorial for those folks who might be looking to tackle the same problem.
The solution for me was a plug-in called cadinput by Oliver Dlang, I'd installed this quite sometime ago, but never actually looked at what it did.
Then I stumbled across this documentation:
https://github.com/olivierdalang/CadInput
and a video about it on Vimeo.
Wondering where I could find the plugin, I looked in my plugins manager, only to find that I already had it installed, so I set about learning how to use it. I later found out, that from version 2.8.0 of QGis on-wards, this plug in is actually built into the core under the advanced digitizing tools.
How to use Cad Input
The documentation doesn't really go into any detail, and there's no commentary on the video, essentially it all boils down to the following shortcut keys however:
- A : angle
- D : distance
- X : x coordinate
- Y : y coordinate
- Combine those with "shift" to toggle absolute/relative mode
- Combine those with "alt" or "ctrl" to toggle locked mode.
- C : construction mode
- P : parallel / perpendicular to a segment
- ESC : unlock all locked parameters
Pick the feature you wish to digitize, and put your layer into editing mode as usual, in my case this is what I'm digitizing.
Once your in editing mode, click on your add new feature icon (again standard stuff) and then look for and activate either the advanced digitizing tools or the cad-input plugin (the icon is the same for both of them)
It looks like a set square with a ruler behind it.
A word of warning here though, if your using a newer QGis Don't Install the Cad-Input plugin. I found that with the plug-in installed, and a version of QGis that included the built in version, the short-cut keys stopped working.
Once I uninstalled the plug-in the shortcut keys started working again, and they are the key to using this tool effectively.
Once you activate the cad-input tool, you should find you have a panel that looks like the following:
(I've drawn some highlights on it...)
- You have your main enable/disable button (Red rectangle)
- A construction mode button (Green Rectangle)
- Parallel and Perpendicular mode buttons (Blue rectangle)
Looking at the shortcut-keys, C turns the construction mode button on/off, P toggles the parallel mode buttons, press it once to get perpendicular, press it twice to select parallel lines.
I'm not going to go fully into the parallel modes here, as the only one I was using was angle lock.
With the new feature tool active, and advanced digitizing enabled, draw the first two points of your rectangle, along one edge of the feature you wish to digitize.
You'll see once you get the second point clicked down, that a thin green construction line protrudes from the end of the line you created.
This is a construction line for the advanced digitizing tools. If you move your mouse downwards, to do the second face, you should find that your cad-input will start to show the angle your moving at.
It's at this point where there's a bit of a difference between the two versions.
In the built-in version, by default, the tool will automatically snap to 90 degree angles (Although you can change this in the options), if this happens you'll see the following:
Notice the blue line at a right angle to the bright green one?
In your digitizing panel, you'll see the angle should be at 90 degrees. If your using the plug-in version, you'll not see this blue line however, but you should still press ctrl+a to lock the angle in the tolls panel.
IN the plug-in version, if you press ctrl+a even with an angle that's not 90 degrees, you'll find that you can mouse over to the panel and type in 90 manually with out affecting your digitizing process, getting 90 in the box and locking it down, is what makes the rest of the process simple.
Continue to add points at the corners of your building, remembering to press ctrl+a after each point you add, this will ensure that your next point is always drawn at 90 degrees to the previous one.
Once you get to the last point, line it up by hand (Unfortunately the tool has no help here..) click to add the last point, then right click to close the polygon as normal.
There's a ton more functionality in the tools too, but no space to document it all here.
My final 100ft view however:
Wouldn't have been possible without it.
No comments:
Post a Comment